Nature Vs Nurture

Nature vs Nurture: Exposing the Truth

Nature vs Nurture

These are some of the questions that the nature vs nurture debate tries to answer. The debate is one of the oldest and most controversial topics in psychology. It explores the relative roles of genetic and environmental factors in shaping human behavior and development.

In this blog post, I will explain what the nature vs nurture debate is, how it has evolved over time, and what the current scientific evidence suggests. I will also provide some examples of how nature and nurture interact in various aspects of human psychology, such as intelligence, personality, mental health, and sexuality.

What is the Nature vs Nurture Debate?

This debate is a debate about the extent to which human behavior and development are determined by genetic factors (nature) or environmental factors (nurture).

Inherited from parents, genetic factors shape traits like eye and hair color, blood type, and DNA, impacting appearance, health, and functions.

Nature vs Nurture

Environmental factors refer to the external influences that we experience throughout our lives, such as our family, friends, culture, education, media, and events. Environmental factors can influence our beliefs, values, attitudes, and behaviors.

This debate is not a simple either-or question, but rather a complex and nuanced one, that involves different levels and types of influences. For example, some traits may be more influenced by nature than by nurture, or vice versa.

Some traits may be influenced by both nature and nurture, but in different ways or degrees. Some traits may be influenced by the interaction or combination of nature and nurture, creating unique outcomes.

New technologies, such as gene editing, may create new possibilities and ethical dilemmas. New social and cultural trends, such as globalization, migration, and diversity, may create new opportunities and challenges.

How Has the Nature vs Nurture Debate Evolved?

The nature vs nurture debate has a long and rich history, dating back to ancient times. Different philosophers, scientists, and thinkers have proposed different views and arguments, supporting either nature or nurture, or a combination of both.

Some of the major milestones and perspectives in the history of the nature vs nurture debate are:

Ancient Greece

The Greek philosophers, such as Plato and Aristotle, debated whether human characteristics and abilities are innate or acquired. Plato believed that humans are born with certain ideas and knowledge, known as innate ideas, that are independent of experience.

Aristotle believed that humans are born with a blank slate, known as tabula rasa, that is filled by experience and observation.

Nature vs Nurture

Middle Ages

The Christian theologians, such as Augustine and Aquinas, debated whether human nature and behavior are influenced by divine grace or free will. Augustine believed that humans are born with original sin, and need divine grace to overcome their sinful tendencies.

Aquinas believed that humans are born with natural law, and have free will to choose between good and evil.


The humanist scholars, such as Erasmus and Montaigne, debated whether human nature and behavior are influenced by culture or individuality. Erasmus believed that humans are shaped by their culture and education, and can improve themselves by learning and reason. Montaigne believed that humans are diverse and unique, and can express themselves by personal experience and judgment.


The empiricist philosophers, like Locke and Hume, debated whether human knowledge and behavior are influenced by sensation or reason. Locke believed that humans are born with a blank slate, and acquire all their knowledge and ideas from sensory experience.

Hume believed that humans are born with some innate faculties, such as memory and imagination, but rely on experience and observation to form their beliefs and habits.


The romantic poets, like Wordsworth and Shelley, debated whether nature or society influences human nature and behavior. Wordsworth believed that humans possess a natural and spontaneous disposition at birth, which is corrupted by society and civilization. Shelley believed that humans are born with a potential for goodness and creativity, but society and institutions oppress this inherent nature.

Nature vs Nurture


Evolutionary biologists, like Darwin and Wallace, proposed that natural selection and adaptation influence human characteristics and abilities. Darwin and Wallace noted species’ trait variations; some traits are more advantageous for survival and reproduction.

They suggested that inheritance and transmission of these traits to the next generation lead to gradual changes and diversification over time.


Behaviorist psychologists, like Watson and Skinner, argued that learning and conditioning influence human behavior. Watson and Skinner discovered that linking stimuli and responses through reinforcement and punishment causes behavioral changes.

They suggested that environmental factors, regardless of genetic or internal factors, can explain and modify all human behavior.


Psychoanalytic psychologists, like Freud and Jung, claimed that unconscious and subconscious forces influence human behavior. Freud and Jung delved into the hidden aspects of the mind—instincts, emotions, and memories—impacting human behavior.

They suggested that bringing these forces to conscious awareness and resolving conflicts and traumas can help understand and improve human behavior.


Geneticists, like Mendel and Watson, discovered that genes and DNA influence human characteristics and abilities. Mendel and Watson identified heredity basics by experimenting with organisms like peas and bacteria, discovering fundamental units and mechanisms.

They suggested that genes and DNA are the carriers and transmitters of genetic information, and that they can influence the physical and biological traits of humans.

Cognitive Science

Cognitive scientists, such as Piaget and Chomsky, proposed that mental processes and structures influence human behavior. Piaget and Chomsky studied human mind development, including perception, memory, language, and reasoning, influencing human behavior.

They suggested that understanding and manipulating the mental processes and structures can analyze and enhance human behavio.


Sociobiologists like Wilson and Dawkins propose that human behavior results from intricate interactions between genetic and environmental factors. Wilson and Dawkins applied evolution and genetics to study human social behavior, including cooperation, aggression, and altruism, influencing human behavior.

They suggested that considering the biological and ecological factors influencing human survival and reproduction can explain and predict human behavior.

See Also

What Does The Current Scientific Evidence Suggest?

Human behavior and development result from complex interactions between nature and nurture, yielding no simple, definitive answer to the debate.

Some of the current scientific methods and findings that support this view are:

Twin Studies

This Type of studies compare similarities and differences between identical (sharing 100% genes) and fraternal twins (sharing 50% genes), raised in various environments.

Twin studies can estimate the relative contribution of nature and nurture to a trait or behavior, by calculating the heritability, which is the proportion of variation that is due to genetic factors.

Nature vs Nurture

High heritability suggests traits are more influenced by nature than nurture. Twin studies reveal genetic influence on traits like intelligence, personality, and mental health. However, twin studies have also shown that environmental factors, such as family, peers, culture, and education, can also influence these traits and behaviors, indicating a significant environmental influence.

Adoption Studies

Adoption studies analyze similarities and differences between adopted children, their biological, and adoptive parents, exploring genetics and environmental influences.

Nature vs Nurture

This studies determine nature and nurture’s role in a trait or behavior by calculating the correlation, indicating the association between variables.

for example, High correlations indicate shared influences on traits. Adoption studies reveal significant genetic and environmental impacts on intelligence, personality, mental health, and sexuality.

See Also

Related Posts

Purple Roses: Varities, Symbolism & Significance

Green Roses: Exploring Rare Varieties, Tips and Crafting

Black Pansies: A Deep Dive Into Nature’s Darkest Beauties


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Benjamin Smith Greetings, fellow garden enthusiasts! I'm Benjamin Smith, the dedicated administrator of, your go-to destination for all things kitchen gardening. As a firm believer in the therapeutic power of plants and the joy of growing your own food, I've curated this space to share my passion and knowledge with you......